[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Patches] Any remaining uses of option groups?
- To: <paul.eggleton@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Patches] Any remaining uses of option groups?
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2013 21:15:24 +0000
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, patches-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I believe there is value in maintaining the option groups. If there are
> problems with maintaining the implementation in its current form,
> perhaps we could discuss ways to address those, rather than dropping the
> functionality entirely?
The fundamental problem is that they are only in EGLIBC and not glibc,
with all the consequent error-prone merging that implies. So, the way to
address that problem is to merge them to glibc (together no doubt with a
version of Steve Longerbeam's patches merged in), with all the discussion
of the feature and how to implement it taking place on libc-alpha. And
without someone merging them to glibc, they will cease to be available for
current versions when the separate EGLIBC source tree ceases to be
maintained. The planned timescale for phasing out the separate EGLIBC
source tree and ceasing merges from glibc to EGLIBC trunk is in
Joseph S. Myers
Patches mailing list