[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [patches] [PATCH] Powerpc/trampline: consider __NO_FPRS__
- To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [patches] [PATCH] Powerpc/trampline: consider __NO_FPRS__
- From: Steven Munroe <munroesj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:37:53 -0500
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 10:24 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Joseph S. Myers | 2010-06-17 20:46:28 [+0000]:
> >I don't see any reason for this to be EGLIBC-specific; have you tried
> >submitting it to libc-alpha?
> No I haven't tried yet. I'm not really sure where this code is used.
> Giving the fact that we store here volatile registers here we might need
> to use evstdd and evldd on __SPE__. What do you think?
DO NOT mix SPE into this code for the standard ISA. Use ports for that.
> >If ignored or rejected there (FSF glibc is
> >unpredictable regarding libc changes for Power soft-float) we can then put
> >it in EGLIBC.
> I give a try :)
> >Send ChangeLog entries as plain text in the body of a patch submission,
> >not as diffs, since they won't generally apply cleanly if any other
> >patches have gone in since you prepared the diff.