[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Patches] [PATCH] ARM: NEON detected memcpy.
- To: Ondřej Bílka <neleai@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Patches] [PATCH] ARM: NEON detected memcpy.
- From: Will Newton <will.newton@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 10:11:59 +0100
On 4 April 2013 07:37, OndÅej BÃlka <neleai@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 12:15:17PM +0800, Shih-Yuan Lee (FourDollars) wrote:
>> Hi Ondrej,
>> I do have some benchmark data.
> Try also benchmark with real world data (20MB). I put it on
How was the workload chosen for this test run? Is it a known "memcpy
Also it looks like the data was captured on x86_64? I suspect we
should use a specific data set for each architecture - the alignment
of data will change depending on the ABI alignment rules and different
compilers inline e.g. constant sized memcpys in different ways. Last
time I looked gcc seemed to be much more aggressive with inlining
string functions on x86 than arm for example.
Toolchain Working Group, Linaro
Patches mailing list