[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [patches] libdfp
- To: rsa@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [patches] libdfp
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:50:55 -0700
Ryan Arnold wrote:
> We want to get libdfp into existing distros that use an older GLIBC or
> EGLIBC and don't want to upgrade yet.
> Additionally, Some GLIBC based distros are opposed to the addition of
> add-ons that didn't originate in official GLIBC tree.
> We feel that, as an extension to the C library, Libdfp belongs near
> GLIBC/EGLIBC but as a matter of gaining adoption it needs to exist as a
> standalone library until ratification of the Draft DFP ISO C Technical
Joseph, do you have any thoughts on this?
Ryan, is this an either/or? Is it possible to organize it as an add-on
to EGLIBC, but still make it possible to build the same code separately
for people who feel that's necessary?
(650) 331-3385 x713