[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [patches] Getting LinuxThreads to work with EGLIBC 2.5 (part 2)
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [patches] Getting LinuxThreads to work with EGLIBC 2.5 (part 2)
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:12:53 -0800
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Still, it's better to be on the safe side. I think reverting
>> is the best thing to do.
> The non-TLS version is *identical* to the old glibc code in EGLIBC 2.3.
> The TLS version is *identical* to the new version on glibc HEAD. I fail
> to see how the concept of having both those versions in the same file with
> #ifdef is significant enough to need an assignment.
If that's the case, then I agree that this change must be OK. However,
I think the ChangeLog entry should include:
which is a partial reversion of:
<Header for Change Reverted>
So that this is clear.
Richard, I'm sorry for the back-and-fro on this.
(650) 331-3385 x713